Development of Contextual-Based Teaching Materials Planning Course at UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan

Zunidar Zunidar

doi:10.30762/didaktika.v10i2.11

Authors

Zunidar Zunidar State Islamic University (UIN) Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v10i2.11

Keywords:

Contextual Learning, Planning Course, Teaching Materials

Abstract

Based on the need for teaching materials designed to meet learning needs, this study aims to analyze the feasibility of teaching materials for the Learning Planning course and the effectiveness of teaching materials for the Learning Planning course. The research method used is development research. Experts validated the teaching materials developed, then continued by individual tests, small group tests, and field groups. Testing the effectiveness of the learning model is done by testing the t-test statistics. The research findings are: first, the teaching materials for the Contextual-Based Learning Planning course show the feasibility level for use in learning activities for the Learning Planning course. Second, the learning Planning course's teaching materials are proven effective for use in learning. The results of statistical testing that the calculated price (5.34)> t table (1.99) proved it, so it can be concluded that the teaching materials developed are effective in improving student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, Lina. “The Contribution of Islamic University Malang as Islamic Private Higher Education in Developing Islamic Civilization.” Didaktika Religia 7, no. 1 (June 1, 2019): 24–44. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v7i1.1462.

Al-Tabany, Trianto Ibnu Badar. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, Dan Kontekstual: Konsep, Landasan, Dan Implementasinya Pada Kurikulum 2013 (Kurikulum Tematik Integratif/KTI). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Anderson, L.W., and D.R. Krathwohl. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Asessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, 2001.

Berns, Robert G, and Patricia M Erickson. “Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy,” 2001.

Daryanto. Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2012.

Glasersfeld, Ernst von. “Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching.” Synthese 80, no. 1 (July 1989): 121–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869951.

Hull, Daniel M, and John C Souders. “The Coming Challenge: Are Community Colleges Ready for the New Wave of Contextual Learners?” Community College Journal 67, no. 2 (1996): 15–17.

Johnson, Elaine B. Contextual Teaching Learning. California: Sage Publication Inc, 2002.

Komalasari, Kokom. Pembelajaran Kontekstual: Konsep Dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Rafika Aditama, 2010.

Marlina, Emas. “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbantuan Aplikasi Sevima Edlink.” Jurnal Padegogik 3, no. 2 (July 31, 2020): 104–10. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i2.2339.

Nawas, Abu. “Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Approach Through React Strategies On Improving The Students’ Critical Thinking In Writing.” International Journal of Management and Applied Science 4, no. 7 (2018).

Nurmawarni, Sukma. “Pengaruh Pendekatan Kontekstual Dalam Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama.” ScienceEdu 1, no. 1 (July 8, 2019): 44. https://doi.org/10.19184/se.v1i1.9492.

Piaget, Jean. Antara Tindakan Dan Pikiran. Translated by Agus Cremers. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2014.

Rahmawati, Septina, and Dhina Cahya Rohim. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Terhadap Keterampilan Menyimak Siswa.” Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian 6, no. 3 (2020).

Rasyid, Fathor. “Developing A Teaching-Learning Model To Enhance Autonomous PTKIN Learners.” Didaktika Religia 9, no. 1 (June 9, 2021): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v9i1.3057.

Sadiman, Arief S., trans. Association for Educational Communication and Technology. The Definition of Educational Terminology. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1986.

Samaresh, Adak. “Effectiveness of Constructivist Approach on Academic Achievement in Science at Secondary Level.” ERIC: Academic Journals Educational Research and Reviews 12, no. 22 (2017).

Sanjaya, Wina. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Seels, Barbara, and Rita Richey. Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of The Field. Translated by Dewi S Prawiradilaga. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 1994.

Setiawan, Panji, and I Dewa Nyoman Sudana. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru 1, no. 2 (December 21, 2018). https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v1i2.16397.

Sugandi, Asep Ikin, and Martin Bernard. “Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP.” Jurnal Analisa 4, no. 1 (June 12, 2018): 172–78. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v4i1.2364.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.

Suprijono, Agus. Cooperative Learning: Teori Dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.

Tsani, Iskandar, Nifa Khoirul Miftah, and Noer Hidayah. “Evaluation of Character Education Strengthening Program at SMA Negeri 2 Kediri.” Didaktika Religia 7, no. 2 (December 14, 2019): 187–206. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v7i2.2174.