Developing a Contextual-Based Teaching Materials Planning Course at UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan

Zunidar Zunidar

doi:10.30762/didaktika.v10i2.11

Authors

Zunidar Zunidar State Islamic University (UIN) Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v10i2.11

Keywords:

Contextual Learning, Planning Course, Teaching Materials

Abstract

In light of the necessity for instructional materials that are tailored to the specific learning requirements of students, this study seeks to assess the viability of creating such materials for a course on planning and to evaluate their efficacy. The research method employed was that of development research. The teaching materials were validated by experts, following which individual tests, small group tests and field groups were conducted. The effectiveness of the learning model was evaluated using a t-test. The findings indicated that the teaching materials for the contextual-based learning planning course demonstrated a high level of feasibility for use in learning activities and were found to be effective for use in learning. Based on the statistical testing results (5.34) > t table (1.99), it can be concluded that the teaching materials developed are effective in improving student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeel, Ahsan, Mandar Gogate, and Amir Hussain. “Contextual Deep Learning-Based Audio-Visual Switching for Speech Enhancement in Real-World Environments.” Information Fusion 59 (July 1, 2020): 163–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.08.008.

Agustina, Lina. “The Contribution of Islamic University Malang as Islamic Private Higher Education in Developing Islamic Civilization.” Didaktika Religia 7, no. 1 (June 1, 2019): 24–44. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v7i1.1462.

Al-Tabany, Trianto Ibnu Badar. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual: Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya Pada Kurikulum 2013 (Kurikulum Tematik Integratif/KTI). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Anderson, L.W., and D.R. Krathwohl. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Asessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, 2001.

Berns, Robert G, and Patricia M Erickson. “Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy,” 2001.

Colognesi, Stéphane, Agnès Deprit, Thibault Coppe, Catherine Van Nieuwenhoven, Virginie März, and Vanessa Hanin. “Developing Student Teachers’ Reflexivity Toward Their Course Planning: Implementation of a Training Program Focused on Writing and Reflective Skills.” Sage Open 11, no. 2 (April 1, 2021): 21582440211016897. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016897.

Daryanto. Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2012.

Glasersfeld, Ernst von. “Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching.” Synthese 80, no. 1 (July 1989): 121–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869951.

Hull, Daniel M, and John C Souders. “The Coming Challenge: Are Community Colleges Ready for the New Wave of Contextual Learners?” Community College Journal 67, no. 2 (1996): 15–17.

Hung, Y.-H., C.-H. Chen, and S.-W. Huang. “Applying Augmented Reality to Enhance Learning: A Study of Different Teaching Materials.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 33, no. 3 (2017): 252–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12173.

Johnson, Elaine B. Contextual Teaching Learning. California: Sage Publication Inc, 2002.

Komalasari, Kokom. Pembelajaran Kontekstual: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Rafika Aditama, 2010.

Marlina, Emas. “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbantuan Aplikasi Sevima Edlink.” Jurnal Padegogik 3, no. 2 (July 31, 2020): 104–10. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i2.2339.

Matovu, Henry, Dewi Ayu Kencana Ungu, Mihye Won, Chin-Chung Tsai, David F. Treagust, Mauro Mocerino, and Roy Tasker. “Immersive Virtual Reality for Science Learning: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation.” Studies in Science Education 59, no. 2 (July 3, 2023): 205–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2082680.

Nawas, Abu. “Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Approach Through React Strategies On Improving The Students’ Critical Thinking In Writing.” International Journal of Management and Applied Science 4, no. 7 (2018).

Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia, and A. Alenezi. “The Role of E-Learning Materials in Enhancing Teaching and Learning Behaviors.” International Journal of Information and Education Technology 10, no. 1 (2020): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1338.

Nurmawarni, Sukma. “Pengaruh Pendekatan Kontekstual Dalam Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama.” ScienceEdu 1, no. 1 (July 8, 2019): 44. https://doi.org/10.19184/se.v1i1.9492.

Piaget, Jean. Antara Tindakan dan Pikiran. Translated by Agus Cremers. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2014.

Rahmawati, Septina, and Dhina Cahya Rohim. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Terhadap Keterampilan Menyimak Siswa.” Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian 6, no. 3 (2020).

Rasyid, Fathor. “Developing A Teaching-Learning Model To Enhance Autonomous PTKIN Learners.” Didaktika Religia 9, no. 1 (June 9, 2021): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v9i1.3057.

Sadiman, Arief S., trans. Association for Educational Communication and Technology. The Definition of Educational Terminology. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1986.

Sailer, Michael, Florian Schultz-Pernice, and Frank Fischer. “Contextual Facilitators for Learning Activities Involving Technology in Higher Education: The C♭-Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 121 (August 1, 2021): 106794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794.

Samaresh, Adak. “Effectiveness of Constructivist Approach on Academic Achievement in Science at Secondary Level.” ERIC: Academic Journals Educational Research and Reviews 12, no. 22 (2017).

Sanjaya, Wina. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Seels, Barbara, and Rita Richey. Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of The Field. Translated by Dewi S Prawiradilaga. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 1994.

Setiawan, Panji, and I Dewa Nyoman Sudana. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru 1, no. 2 (December 21, 2018). https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v1i2.16397.

Sugandi, Asep Ikin, and Martin Bernard. “Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP.” Jurnal Analisa 4, no. 1 (June 12, 2018): 172–78. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v4i1.2364.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.

Suprijono, Agus. Cooperative Learning: Teori Dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.

Suryawati, Evi, and Kamisah Osman. “Contextual Learning: Innovative Approach towards the Development of Students’ Scientific Attitude and Natural Science Performance.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14, no. 1 (October 27, 2017): 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329.

Tsani, Iskandar, Nifa Khoirul Miftah, and Noer Hidayah. “Evaluation of Character Education Strengthening Program at SMA Negeri 2 Kediri.” Didaktika Religia 7, no. 2 (December 14, 2019): 187–206. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v7i2.2174.

Widyaningsih, Sri Wahyu, and Irfan Yusuf. “Implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Assisted by E-Learning through Lesson Study Activities to Improve the Quality of Learning in Physics Learning Planning Courses.” International Journal of Higher Education 9, no. 1 (December 23, 2019): 60. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p60.